The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) recently researched the ‘time to fill” metric and found that their sampling produced an average time to process of 33.28 days.  The number includes weekends and holidays.  The challenge, according to an article in the SHRM news is to keep it under 30 days.  The article offers some suggestions to facilitate this goal.

Initially, companies should always include head count and projected growth as part of the annual budget/forecast process.  This helps the recruiting department plan ahead, and keep an eye out for needed talent. 

Then – set a timeline for the process.  If you have been looking ahead, you should be able to get past the “let’s see who we can find” that traps you in a perpetual candidate identification circle.  Set a realistic deadline for receiving applications and move on.  Once the candidates have been presented, set a schedule for phone and face-to-face interviews, assessing and processing the hire. 

Review the process itself and answer some key questions – who will do the interviewing, how will they report results, and how (and who) will candidates be kept informed of the progress?  If communication and understanding isn’t there, the “time-to-fill” will be out of control.

Technology Ventures Corporation provides continuing education classes on all aspects of starting a company and one of the sessions spends significant time on preparing for and conducting interviews.  An important task is the initial screening of the applicant resumes.  A thorough review of that document can save lots of wasted time later in the recruitment process, and help reaffirm exactly what types of candidates the company is looking for.

Remember- the candidate may have other prospects, and you want to keep them interested while your team is making decisions.  The worst outcome of a hiring activity is to have your chosen candidate say “I just accepted another offer last__.”  Pick one “mentor’ to stay in touch with your best prospects.

It goes without saying that those conducting the interviews should be well trained and prepped for the task.   Good luck!

The other side: 
- Be careful not to discriminate against older workers when looking for interns.  The perception is that these jobs go to young graduates, but there are many older workers wanting new skills.
- Interns sometimes perceive that they are not subject to employer’s policies even if they sign the appropriate documents.  Similarly supervisors may think the same way.  Abuses of internships by both parties can lead to legal claims and end up being more of a hassle than the program is worth.  The key, of course is clear direction and careful management by the supervisor, with the help of the Human Resource group.
- Foreign workers on a visa do take internship jobs, and so the visa requirements need to be carefully managed as well. 

Companies need to set clear goals for their internship programs and make certain they are reaching them.  The primary reason a company has this program is to have access to a pool of possible hires.  If the company can’t identify good candidates in this pool, then it isn’t being managed correctly.  If the company isn’t able to add new employees, the time spent on training may not be worth it, even though it contributes to the business community overall.

Each company has its own special needs, and decisions about internships need to fit these needs.

This could be the tip of an iceberg, as the growing use of these tests early in the hiring process is a relatively new area.  The perception is that some of these questions could hurt people with mental disorders, and is likened to a “medical exam”. 

Apparently the employment assessment market overall is worth $2 billion and growing.  It was estimated by one research firm that  one-third of employers are using testing for hiring and promotions.

There is strong disagreement between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the ACLU on the use of these tests.  Jeanne Goldberg, advisor for the EEOC had no problem with applicants answering non-job related questions to see if the person’s personality will do well in a particular job. 

The article on MSNBC quoted some sample questions from a McDonald’s survey.  They included “I am sometimes unkind to others”, “I often lose my patience with other”, and “I dislike having several things to do on the same day”.  Ms Goldberg from the EEOC saw no issue with this survey.

The ACLU on the other had said that a lot of these standardized tests are weeding devices, and ones without real meaning.  The spokesperson said that employers were always looking for the magic test, but they didn’t accomplish much.  The applicant’s recourse was to decide not to work for the organization.

The question remains, how do you find the best candidates for your company – not only with appropriate skills, but with a work ethic that fits with the organization?  It doesn’t seem we’ve found the perfect tool just yet.  Good luck!

Typically in a one-hour interview the hiring manager will ask 10-12 questions, and these questions should be geared to learning as much as you can in regards to the above goals.  However, there is a lot of prep time to hone these questions to produce the desired results.

Noah Apodaca, recruiter for UC Irvine, wrote an article for the Society for Human Resource Management newsletter (shrm.org) on what to ask and how to ask it to get the best response from your candidates.    The questions need to give the candidate an opportunity to share their skills and experience

. 
So here are a few examples of good/bad ways to ask the questions:
* Don’t ask: “Why do you want to work here/want this job?”  This elicits a response on how great the company is and what a great opportunity they have.  In fact the basic reason is that the candidate needs to make money!
* Ask instead – “What particular skills or experiences make you the best match for this position?”, or even more behavioral-based:  What would your most recent supervisor say are the skills that make you the best-qualified candidate for this position?”  This allows them to highlight the things they found to be important from researching the company and the position.
* Don’t ask:  “Where do you see yourself in five years?”  The obvious answer is with the company providing great contributions to the organization.  This gives you no insight on the candidate’s vision concerning professional growth.
* Ask instead – “Where does this position fall in your career path?”  This is more open ended, and also lets you see whether the candidate does have a vision or sees this job as a destination job.
* Don’t ask: “What was the worst thing about your last employer?”  This encourages the candidate to whine, or in the least, break professional decorum.
* Ask instead – “What aspects of your previous  position did you find most professionally challenging?”  This allows candidates to reflect on how they felt their skills matched the challenges of their most recent workplace, and even to suggest how they would improve that situation. 

This is just a short list of the types of interview questions that can be helpful to managers in trying to find the best person for the job.  It is difficult, but a good outcome is rewarding both for the manager and the company.  Good luck!

So, one of the main requirements for success was understanding your business as it exists and what type of leadership you need for the future.  For example a startup company is going to need a leader who is comfortable “working without a net” in that they will be establishing processes and building a team as they progress.  In a more established business, the candidate will need to be able to work within the goals and processes already established and to be able to motivate the team to work within these goals, as well as looking for new opportunities for growth.  Finally a company in a rapidly changing market will need a good strategic planner to keep the company in the game and growing.

Once the company has defined their leadership needs, then they need to look at the types of managerial skills the job will require.  The SHRM report defined three broad sets of skills, technical, interpersonal and conceptual.  The perception is that technical skills are most important at the middle management level; interpersonal skills are important at all levels, and conceptual skills are important at the executive level.  A more recent approach added another factor – business acumen – to the mix, and there are many different opinions on which skills are most important. 

Within these broad categories each company can define specific factors that are important for their organization.  Once that is done, building a job listing, interview questions and a set of criteria to evaluate the candidates becomes easier and more effective. 

Successful hiring of executive talent is one way companies can survive and beat their competition.  In the market today there is a lot of talent that can help your company be successful.  Good luck!

First let’s look at why.  The economy is reportedly recovering, and sections of the technology industry are part of that recovery.  Computer hardware and software, as well as renewable energy businesses are planning for growth.  Meanwhile, the pool of qualified talent in science, engineering and math skills is not going to be able to meet our predicted demands.  Companies also need experienced leadership to take them to the next level.  Logically hiring managers will look at the existing workforce to try to fill those gaps. 

An even bigger issue is that most organizations aren’t prepared to address this threat.  How can you prevent your top talent from leaving for what they perceive as greener pastures?  The first step is to take a good look at which of your employees might be a target for poaching.  Then look at what your company can do to avert the threat. 

In the current economic climate, giving folks a raise isn’t always an option, but money isn’t always the answer.  As long as the compensation is competitive in the industry, there are other things that might encourage loyalty to the current employer. 
It sounds like a broken record, but flexible work hours is one of the things employees really appreciate.  One candidate I know is wanting to make a change, but the thought of losing 4 weeks vacation a  year and flexible work hours holds him back. 

Another possibility is to assign your star performers to exciting and stimulating projects.  A challenging, interesting assignment can be as satisfying as a raise for some. 

There is always to option of asking employees to sign noncompete agreements or other legally binding contracts, but that’s not always a morale builder, and has to be carefully crafted.  High tech companies with a lot of research going on may be an instance where this is important. 

In the end, your successful and talented staff are an asset to protect as you plan for your own growth and success.  Include them in any strategic planning as you go!